My informal survey tells me that Joe Arpaio supporters have a mean education that is truly lacking.
Not everyone can afford a college education, but the sweeping generalizations that come out of your mouths are amazing. You are the reason that our racist sheriff has survived so long.
I’m truly sorry that you feel so threatened by the justice department and their stinging condemnation of Sheriff Joe. There are times in this life when truth hurts.
D.J. Diebold
Scottsdale
VofReason posted at 12:37 pm on Wed, Dec 21, 2011.
That is a loaded statement. It would mean that the majority of voters in Maricopa county for the last 5 election cycles are "uneducated". Or at least below the standard of the author. How could so many be so wrong and so "uneducated" as Mr Diebold states? Or maybe it is him that is wrong.
Rich posted at 3:12 pm on Wed, Dec 21, 2011.
Arizona has "a mean education that is truly lacking." It's not exactly news.
"It would mean that the majority of voters in Maricopa county for the last 5 election cycles are "uneducated". What better proof of that could possibly be assembled than Joe Arpaio? Talk about stating the obvious.
Dale Whiting posted at 3:23 pm on Wed, Dec 21, 2011.
D.J.
Although Rich makes light of your claim and VofReason makes light of you, I merely caution you to not jump off one end of the log just because you see others jumping off of the other end. I know plenty of Arpaio supporters, strong strict enforcement advocates like Leon, with college educations who simply lack the first hand experience several of us on this site have had and reported.
But now that Joe has attracted national attention and some supporters are questioning him, it is time for those supporters to listen to both us and others and send Joe packing.
antirino posted at 4:55 pm on Wed, Dec 21, 2011.
That’s what I like. A letter chock full of rock solid evidence and facts. Not just unsupported opinion!
Accuracy posted at 6:00 pm on Wed, Dec 21, 2011.
D.J. (Donald) Diebold, behavioral counseling and psychological assessment . . . “psycho” for short.
Again, “Open Border” D.J. supports the law-breaking illegal aliens, Homeland Security Secretary Janet A. Napolitano, and the increasingly lawless Liberal Democrat party allegation that Sheriff Joe Arpaio has racially profiled illegal immigrants. Stressing that, too many of the illegals the Maricopa County Sheriffs arrested were Mexican.
onerebel posted at 7:16 pm on Wed, Dec 21, 2011.
D.J, says that everyone that supports Sheriff Joe is an idiot, and then condemns Joe for supposedly being a Racist. Awe the Liberal hypocrisy !
Leon Ceniceros posted at 7:42 pm on Wed, Dec 21, 2011.
Wow...double.... Wow.
I was flipping TV Channels the other day and came across the Lawrence O'Donnell Show morphing into the Rachel Maddow Show and it crossed my mind..."what would you get if ... "Mad Dog" Larry O'Connell and "Shock Jock" Rachel Maddow had a kid. We may have our answer, Folks.
Mendel should have used Democrat TV Talk Show hosts instead of fruit flies for his experiments.....lol
Today, we get to know what it was like to be a Republican on the floor of the Congress when New York's Democrat Congressman Weiner (pre-texting himself in Fruit-of-the-Looms to unsuspecting women) went "viral" (more like feral....lol) when one of Obama's Socialist Programs got shot down. Talk about "lowest common denominator"...what ever happened to the touchie-feelie, "can't we all just get along", Kumbaya rhetoric that was being spouted by the Libs, the Dems, the Socialist/Commie-Wannabe's and our Left-Wing Newspaper and TV Media... at the beginning of the year. That "dog and pony" show sure didn't last long.....[wink]
Rational Human posted at 12:30 pm on Thu, Dec 22, 2011.
There are times in this life when truth hurts.
Eric Holder and the Obama Administration are applying the full weight of the federal government’s resources into trying to stop the new Arizona immigration law, but that’s only one of the multi-front attacks they’ve setup to make sure states are stripped of their ability to enforce U.S. immigration laws. Now the DOJ is suing the most active and largest sheriff’s office in Arizona (Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s office has 189 officers) by extending an investigation into alleged civil rights violations.
Back in March of 2009 the DOJ informed sheriff Arpaio that a probe was underway to investigate what the DOJ claimed were “alleged patterns or practices of discriminatory police practices and unconstitutional searches and seizures.” This is where things get sticky for Eric Holder and the Obama Administration.
Six months prior to this investigation the Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency (ICE) had already conducted its own investigation of sheriff Arpaio’s office and not only gave it a clean bill of health, they actually gave a raving review. The report said things like “The OI and DRO supervisors consider the conduct and performance of the MCSO … officers to be professional and meeting the requirement of the MOA.” And that they considered the working relationship between the feds and the sheriff’s office to be “excellent” and that cases brought by the sheriff’s office to be “high quality.”
The DOJ then got caught with its pants down when more government documents were uncovered under the Freedom of Information Act that suggests politics may be at the root of the investigation. Sheriff Arpaio’s lawyers found a March 11, 09 e-mail, that was sent just after the Justice Department investigation was announced, from an Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency employee to John P. Torres who was at the time the acting assistant secretary of ICE. The email said: “Did you see this?” attaching a news report on the investigation. “Yes,” Torres responded a few minutes later. “Interesting politics at play.”
Thursday’s DOJ lawsuit against sheriff Arpaio is for Arpaio’s allegedly failing to cooperate fully in the probe, despite the fact there has already been an ongoing probe for over a year and a half now and not a single charge has been levied against Arapio or his office by the DOJ for violating anyone’s civil rights.
With the new evidence found in the case by Arpaio’s lawyers including the Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s raving reviews, emails hinting at this being a politically motivated case and the fact a year and a half investigation has not found one civil rights violation, Eric Holder and the Obama Administration appear to be legally and politically in trouble again.
VofReason posted at 12:41 pm on Thu, Dec 22, 2011.
Easy answer Leon, the progressives are becoming more militant
TeaPartyPatriot posted at 4:17 pm on Thu, Dec 22, 2011.
On December 15 the Department of Homeland Security kicked Sheriff Joe Arpaio out of the immigration enforcement business. On December 16, DHS Secretary Napolitano met with Mexican front groups, including Take Back Aztlan, and said in the short future there won't be a border between Mexico and the United States. On December 20, Barack Obama said he was cutting the National Guard on the border. The next day, December 21, we learned that 35 percent of the CBP personnel are Hispanic --- more than twice their proportion of the population.
Also on December 21, ICE refused to take suspected illegal aliens from the Maricopa County Sheriffs Office.
Connecting these closely placed dots it is plain to see that Barack Obama is leading a broad effort to subvert the sovereignty of the United States in favor of Mexico. Those Americans who see this picture and do nothing are cowards.
DataMan posted at 7:29 am on Fri, Dec 23, 2011.
"educated people don't vote for Joe"
-Lisa Allen, MCSO Director of Public Releations
Dale Whiting posted at 9:16 am on Fri, Dec 23, 2011.
DataMan,
I'll take that as "Public Relations." I don't proof my comments either!
TeaPartyPatsey,
Are you off your meds again? I'm sure that Leon and RationalHuman would gladly lend you some of theirs!
P.S. I'll still waiting for the credible cite to a statement of what the TeaParty stands for! And how do you respond to today's extension of the payroll tax cuts?
Slabside posted at 11:40 am on Fri, Dec 23, 2011.
Dale says: "P.S. I'll still waiting for the credible cite to a statement of what the TeaParty stands for!"
But he says this in September:
Dale Whiting posted at 7:36 am on Mon, Sep 5, 2011.
"We Whites do have own support groups. Ever heard of the KKK? And when was the last time you saw a picture of a Tea Party ralley with a minority pictured in it?"
The bigot and his hypocrisy knows no bounds.
Leon Ceniceros posted at 5:01 pm on Fri, Dec 23, 2011.
The "Tea Party" stands for Patriotism....that's what the LIbs, the Progressives, the Democrats, the Socialist/Communists/Left-Wingers don't understand.....WHAT THE WORD ...."PATRIOTISM".......means.