East Valley Tribune

May 18, 2013 | 09:09 am
East Valley Tribune Facebook East Valley Tribune Twitter East Valley Tribune Mobile Version East Valley Tribune Facebook
Best of East Valley 2013

Letter: The war is on the innocent

Print
Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Wednesday, March 28, 2012 8:47 am

“War on Women?” How about “War on the Innocent.” Why is it if you speak to the rights of the unborn you are labeled as a warrior against women. The right not to get pregnant is clearly the right of all women. If they fail to protect that right, then the destruction of the baby is the true casualty of war.

TJ Jackson

Mesa

More about

  • Discuss

Welcome to the discussion.

6 comments:

  • Slabside posted at 10:10 am on Wed, Mar 28, 2012.

    Slabside Posts: 1680

    Well said TJ Jackson.

     
  • Accuracy posted at 12:00 pm on Wed, Mar 28, 2012.

    Accuracy Posts: 1909

    President Obama's controversial healthcare “ObamaCare” is a direct assault on the lives of unborn babies. The law that would force Americans to finance abortion, birth control, and controversial emergency contraception.

    As TJ Jackson wrote – How about “War on the Innocent.”

    The U.S. Supreme Court decision will determine if we will be paying for abortions and if the government can control our medical decisions, and Americans across the country are concerned about what the nine Justices will decide.

     
  • Arizona Willie posted at 2:33 pm on Wed, Mar 28, 2012.

    Arizona Willie Posts: 1903

    I don't know why the Feds couldn't make everyone buy insurance.

    They make everyone pay taxes.
    The used to make every male sign up for the draft.
    They make everyone who travels outside the country get a passport and they cost money.
    The government makes people do a lot of things.

    Being insured is just one more and it spreads the costs.

     
  • Masterrogue666 posted at 2:53 pm on Wed, Mar 28, 2012.

    Masterrogue666 Posts: 1797

    What if your wife, or daughter is raped and gets impregnated AGAINST THEIR WILL?

    Why should they be forced to carry the child of their rapist? I'm not saying it's the fetus's fault, mind you. But said victim has already endured one life changing event. Forcing two upon them is unthinkable in my book.

     
  • VofReason posted at 1:09 pm on Thu, Mar 29, 2012.

    VofReason Posts: 1381

    I think many who disdain abortion would agree that their are circumstances that would allow for it- rape, incest, mother's mortality. However, if you made those reasons the only reasons for abortion, it would reduce the number significantly. Problem is now it is used mostly as contraception for the stupid and selfish

     
  • Dale Whiting posted at 12:44 pm on Sun, Apr 1, 2012.

    Dale Whiting Posts: 3705

    Folks,

    Roe v. Wade as argued and decided decades ago. Are we going to re-argue it today?[sad]

     

Rules of Conduct

Welcome!
|
Not you?||
LogoutMy Dashboard
Loading…