MUNICH, Germany- Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld issued uncompromising challenges to both the United Nations and NATO over Iraq on Saturday, warning that the global bodies risked ridicule and discredit and cautioning three of America’s European partners that delaying plans to defend Turkey weakened the Atlantic alliance.
As Rumsfeld spoke, thousands of people joined a protest called by church and labor leaders in the heart of Munich to protest any war in Iraq. The senior U.N. weapons inspectors landed in Baghdad on what could be their last visit, seeking significant moves by Iraq to prove that it has really disarmed.
Rumsfeld said the United Nations, by allowing Iraq to violate 17 Security Council resolutions over more than a decade, appeared to be following the League of Nations in choosing bluff over action.
Allowing Iraq to become chairman of the U.N. Commission on Disarmament and selecting Libya to lead its Commission on Human Rights showed that the institution ‘‘seems not to be even struggling to regain credibility,’’ he said.
‘‘That these acts of irresponsibility could happen now, at this moment in history, is breathtaking,’’ Rumsfeld said. ‘‘Those acts will be marked in the history of the U.N. as either the low point of that institution in retreat, or the turning point when the U.N. woke up, took hold of itself, and moved away from a path of ridicule to a path of responsibility.’’
Turning to America’s NATO partners, Rumsfeld was critical of France, Germany and Belgium for what he said were ‘‘inexcusable’’ actions to postpone alliance planning to defend Turkey in the event of war with Iraq.
‘‘Turkey will not be hurt,’’ Rumsfeld said. ‘‘The United States and the countries in NATO will go right ahead and do it. What will be hurt will be NATO, not Turkey.’’
Kofi Annan, the U.N. secretary-general, said Saturday in a speech at the
College of William and Mary that the United States should not try to break the Security Council’s unity on Iraq and that it should take time for ‘‘patient’’ negotiations before rushing into war.
NTV, a Turkish-language news channel, reported that Turkey’s leaders had agreed to accept up to 38,000 American troops for an operation in Iraq, and that they would allow American planes to use six Turkish air bases.
Senior Turkish leaders, who were meeting with American diplomats, were not available for comment, and the report could not be confirmed. The Turkish parliament would have to approve any such agreement and is scheduled to vote Feb. 18 on whether to allow American troops to use the country for an attack on Iraq.
In an animated rebuttal to Rumsfeld, Joschka Fischer, the German foreign minister, said his nation was not abandoning its obligations to defend Turkey, but suggested that NATO planners await the next report of the weapons inspectors on Feb. 14.
‘‘We didn’t want an extra buildup to be done, so to speak, before the decisive Security Council meeting,’’ Fischer said.
Proposals for NATO’s defense of Turkey include deploying Patriot anti-missile batteries and surveillance aircraft.
Fischer said he had no argument with the American assessment of Saddam Hussein as a dictator who has fired Scud missiles at his neighbors and has used chemical weapons.
‘‘Why this priority now?’’ he asked Rumsfeld. ‘‘We have known this for a long time.’’
Fischer recounted Germany’s arguments for international inspectors to continue their efforts in Iraq, especially given new intelligence disclosed last week by Secretary of State Colin Powell, and he contrasted the American case for military action.
‘‘I am not convinced,’’ Fischer said. ‘‘This is my problem.’’
The influential Der Spiegel weekly, in advance copies released on Saturday, reported that France and Germany were considering a plan to deploy thousands of U.N. peacekeepers and hundreds more weapons inspectors to prevent military conflict in Iraq.
Livid American officials denounced the fact that they first heard of the possible plan from reporters.
‘‘That’s not the way to have a winning hand with the United States,’’ said a senior American official. In fact, the official said, Rumsfeld asked the German defense minister, Peter Struck, about the report, and was told, ‘‘We’re not ready to talk yet.’’ The American official indicated that the United States would not support the plan, citing the failure of U.N. forces to prevent massacres in Bosnia.
A German government spokesman confirmed that the two nations were working together to find a peaceful alternative to war, but declined to give any details.
The lively exchange occurred during an annual conference on international security here, a gathering on defense issues, where former directors of the Central Intelligence Agency mingle with Russian national security czars, government ministers meet in formal bilateral sessions and in elegant private dinners.
Rumsfeld’s theme that the nations of the world faced a momentous decision was echoed by Sen. John McCain, RAriz., who told the conference that France and Germany had dealt a ‘‘terrible injury’’ to the alliance and ‘‘raised doubts among nations on both sides of the Atlantic about their commitment to multinational diplomacy.’’
Despite Rumsfeld’s lengthy public criticism of the United Nations for its handling of Iraq, he spoke with his Russian counterpart, Sergei Ivanov, of the important role that one of its organs, the International Atomic Energy Agency, must play in defusing the current nuclear crisis in North Korea.
During a closed-door bilateral between the two defense ministers, Rumsfeld and Ivanov agreed that North Korea posed a threat to the entire world, and that it should be dealt with as an ‘‘international problem,’’ according to a senior Defense Department official.
Rumsfeld saluted the leaders of Britain, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Hungary, Italy, Poland, Portugal and Spain, who wrote a letter pledging their commitment to disarming Iraq.