California plans sequel to energy deregulation - East Valley Tribune: Business

California plans sequel to energy deregulation

Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Sunday, November 2, 2003 5:55 am | Updated: 2:06 pm, Thu Oct 6, 2011.

SAN FRANCISCO - No stranger to sequels, California Gov.-elect Arnold Schwarzenegger hopes to sell the state on the virtues of electricity deregulation for a second time, despite the expensive legacy of the first attempt.

Schwarzenegger’s energy advisers say they will bring a fresh approach to deregulation this time, avoiding past mistakes that led to rolling blackouts, insolvent utilities, market manipulation and a $20 billion debt customers must spend the next decade repaying.

‘‘We have a system that is broken, with pieces laying on the ground that need to be picked up and put back together again,’’ said James Sweeney, a Stanford University professor who helped write Schwarzenegger’s energy plan.

Deregulation critics are unnerved by Schwarzenegger’s proposal, arguing it would expose California to major risks at a time the financially strapped state can’t afford to gamble.

‘‘It looks like he wants to put us back on the rollercoaster of a very dangerous experiment,’’ said Public Utilities Commissioner Loretta Lynch, who dealt with California’s energy turmoil in 2001.

In his campaign, Schwarzenegger depicted electricity bills as a drag on the state’s economy, a problem he thinks he can alleviate by loosening energy regulations.

‘‘High energy rates are an unacceptable burden for people who live and do business in California,’’ Schwarzenegger says in an energy policy statement on his Web site, ‘‘The current bureaucratic rules are making the crisis worse, instead of better.’’

Schwarzenegger aides say his proposed reforms are mostly the work of three men: Stanford’s Sweeney, who wrote a book analyzing California’s electricity crisis; Sean Randolph, president of the San Francisco-based Bay Area Economic Forum, a group that represents business and government interests; and Lawrence Makovich, a senior director for Cambridge Energy Research Associates, a Massachusetts research firm.

The men met with Schwarzenegger last month and then drew up an energy policy based largely on their research, Sweeney and Randolph said in interviews. Makovich didn’t return a message.

Based on what Schwarzenegger has disclosed, ‘‘it’s an encouraging plan, one that seems to be very forward looking,’’ said Severin Borenstein, director of the Energy Institute at the University of California at Berkeley. Borenstein isn’t working with Schwarzenegger but is listed in the acknowledgments of Sweeney’s book.

It’s unlikely electricity deregulation will be at the top of Schwarzenegger’s agenda. He has an $8 billion budget deficit to deal with and may have to defeat a legislative bill and a ballot-box initiative proposing to reregulate the electricity market.

Still, California will probably need to adopt more reforms to lower the highest electricity prices in the continental United States and address an inadequate power supply, Borenstein said.

The first overhaul was signed into law in 1996 by then-Gov. Pete Wilson, now a Schwarzenegger adviser. The changes were hailed as a way to lower prices by fostering more competition and investment in the state’s electricity market.

But through June, California households paid rates 44 percent above the national average and 64 percent above the average in 10 neighboring Western states, according to the most recent data from the U.S. Energy Information Administration. The disparity is greater for businesses, with average rates 57 percent above the national average and 91 percent above neighboring states.

California lacks enough power plants to meet longterm needs. Without more market incentives to expand generating capacity, energy shortages could hit between 2006 and 2008.

Schwarzenegger believes new and improved deregulation will avert another electricity shortage and eventually drive bills down for many customers. His plan envisions a market where customers pay a little more to provide generators with an incentive to build more plants and increase the state’s reserves.

To lower their costs, big businesses would be allowed to buy power from other sources besides California’s major utilities. Major power customers also would be forced to install metering equipment so they could be charged higher prices during peak demand periods.

Meanwhile, most households would still get power from closely regulated utilities: Pacific Gas and Electric, Southern California Edison and San Diego Gas and Electric. Their prices wouldn’t fluctuate much, except in unusual circumstances.

The PUC’s Lynch, a Democrat appointed by recalled Gov. Gray Davis, depicts Schwarzenegger’s blueprint as a rehash of the Wilson administration’s old ideas.

Architects of Schwarzenegger’s plan say it’s unfair to compare it to the 1996 changes.

  • Discuss

'EV Women in Business'

A PDF of the Tribune special section, featuring a mix of sponsored content from our loyal advertisers and newsroom coverage of the East Valley business community.

Your Az Jobs