Is the president a good sport? - East Valley Tribune: Health

Is the president a good sport?

Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Thursday, August 26, 2010 11:00 pm

I realize that picking a president by his or her ability to play sports, or least talk about them, would saddle the country with leaders with such names as Jeter, Pippin or Manning. But my take on the bad run of presidents since Teddy Roosevelt cluttered up the White House with big game is that many modern presidents have had a complicated relationship with the national pastimes. Maybe it was the German strategist Clausewitz who said that sports is the extension of politics by other means?

To be sure, presidents up to and including Barack Obama have played sports, and many have played their games well. I have no doubt that Bill Clinton shoots a reasonable if erratic game of golf or that former Yale baseball player, George Herbert Walker Bush, throws competitive horseshoes. But how many presidents would you have wanted in your fantasy league, and how many (I am thinking of Richard Nixon) picked up the clubs only when a few photographers were in the rough?

To see if there is a correlation between good presidents and good sportsmen, let's sort out the players from the duffers. Here's my list of those who could play the games: Teddy Roosevelt (rod and gun), Franklin Roosevelt (excellent at golf before polio, and sailing afterward), Jack Kennedy (golf, girls and touch football, although not in that order), Gerald Ford (football in college, tennis in the White House, the Pro-Am circuit in retirement) and the George Bushes (speed golf, cigarette boats).

On the bench, so to speak, I would place: William Howard Taft (of sumo proportions), Woodrow Wilson (hard to imagine him playing much pond hockey, although he did ride horses), Warren Harding (are cards considered a sport?), Calvin Coolidge ("harrumph"), Herbert Hoover (a fan of the medicine ball), Harry Truman (although he was brisk walker), Lyndon Johnson (beagle-handling does not count), Nixon (despite the bowling poster in "The Big Lebowski" and installing lanes in the White House), Ronald Reagan (lifeguarding, horseback riding, the original Brush Clearer), and Jimmy Carter (knocked out by a killer rabbit).

I have my doubts about Dwight Eisenhower, who played 800 rounds of golf as president but still only had an 18 handicap, and Obama, who despite his pick-up basketball and vacation golf has the shadow of a 37 (in bowling) hanging over his presidency. (Kids without barriers usually score better than 37. If the birthers want proof of alien associations, they should look into this.)

Sports and politics came together harmoniously with Franklin Roosevelt. When he ran for the presidency in 1932, he began his campaign with a long sailing trip in the waters off New England, and the image of Roosevelt at the helm quelled whatever fears there might have been about his incapacity. Roosevelt was, in fact, an excellent sailor.

Likewise, Kennedy used sports to cover up a chronically bad back, Addison's disease and a host of other ailments that had him under constant medical care. Instead of a bedridden presidential candidate, the public saw a "vigorous" man playing touch football on the lawn at Hyannis Port or heading out in a sailboat. In retrospect, the images of a robust president were as manufactured as those of Family Man Kennedy.

The ability to talk about sports might add more to presidential success than the ability to play the games. Sports talk is one of the few common languages for much of the United States. Without any ability to speak it, a candidate on the campaign trail would find himself with a lot of awkward pauses in the company of local politicos.

The former radio sportscaster "Dutch" Reagan could obviously talk a good game. For much of his broadcasting career, all he had were the wire-service reports of the action, and he would have to invent the play, much as he later made up economic theories (the Laffer Curve) or history ("I did not trade arms for hostages"). Few had the Gipper's gift of small talk, and a lot of it revolved around sports.

By this logic, President Obama ought to be one of the more successful American presidents. He occasionally joins the broadcast at half-time in key college basketball games, he picked the NCAA champion in his 2009 bracket and he seems to enjoy golf. Why, then, are his approval ratings on a par with presidents who never hit a three-pointer?

Part of the explanation can be gleaned in one of the many health-care posts I have read recently. The correspondent was despairing of the president's ability to convince Congress to pass the legislation, which prompted a digression into Obama's wounded-duck throw with last year's All-Star ceremonial pitch (apparently George W. Bush threw high heat) and, of course, the 37. Meaning: He's losing the sports-bar, call-in-radio constituency, which matters more than Iowa caucuses.

By my logic, Clinton got impeached not for groping an intern but for boasting he had broken 80 in a golf game. (In the words of Jack Nicklaus: "Eighty with fifty floating mulligans.") Nor did Ford's presidency ever recover from his erratic tee shots. Doubts surfaced about W not over Iraq but when it was reported that he had watched the Super Bowl by himself.

The hope for the Obama presidency is that it will return to his sporting roots. On the campaign trail, he watched a lot of "SportsCenter," and he is a longtime White Sox fan, perhaps even in the days of their Disco Demolition Night.

Clearly, he has affection for his basketball, and my guess is that he spends more time than a president should thinking about the NBA draft. All are hopeful signs for his time in office.

Matthew Stevenson is the editor, along with Michael Martin, of "Rules of the Game: The Best Sports Writing from Harper's Magazine," published by Franklin Square Press. He is based in Geneva.

More about

  • Discuss

Facebook on Facebook

Twitter on Twitter

Google+ on Google+


Subscribe to via RSS

RSS Feeds

Your Az Jobs