ST. LOUIS (AP) — Missouri Congressman Todd Akin, the conservative Republican U.S. Senate candidate, quickly backed off comments that aired earlier Sunday, in which he told an interviewer that a woman's body "has ways" to prevent pregnancy during rape and that such pregnancies are "really rare."
Akin, a six-term congressman running against incumbent Democrat Sen. Claire McCaskill, was asked in an interview that aired Sunday on St. Louis television station KTVI if he would support abortions for women who have been raped.
"It seems to me first of all from what I understand from doctors that's really rare," Akin said. "If it's a legitimate rape, the female body has ways to try to shut that whole thing down," Akin said of a rape victim's chances of becoming pregnant.
He also said he would prefer that punishment for rape be focused on the rapist and not "attacking the child."
Akin said in an emailed statement later Sunday that he "misspoke" during the interview, though the statement did not say specifically which points.
"In reviewing my off-the-cuff remarks, it's clear that I misspoke in this interview and it does not reflect the deep empathy I hold for the thousands of women who are raped and abused every year," Akin's statement said. "Those who perpetrate these crimes are the lowest of the low in our society and their victims will have no stronger advocate in the Senate to help ensure they have the justice they deserve."
Akin also said in the statement he believes "deeply in the protection of all life and I do not believe that harming another innocent victim is the right course of action."
Akin was interviewed on KTVI's "The Jaco Report," and also talked about numerous campaign issues, such as voter ID laws, the economy and Medicare. KTVI said the interview was conducted earlier in the week.
McCaskill, who is seeking a second term, said in an emailed statement Sunday that she found the comments "offensive."
"It is beyond comprehension that someone can be so ignorant about the emotional and physical trauma brought on by rape," McCaskill said. "The ideas that Todd Akin has expressed about the serious crime of rape and the impact on its victims are offensive."
This month, Akin won the state's Republican U.S. Senate primary by a comfortable margin of victory. During the primary, Akin enhanced his standing with TV ads in which former Arkansas governor and presidential candidate Mike Huckabee praised him as "a courageous conservative" and "a Bible-based Christian" who "supports traditional marriage" and "defends the unborn."
Akin, a former state lawmaker who first won election to the U.S. House in 2000, also has a long-established base among evangelical Christians, and was endorsed in the primary by more than 100 pastors.
Within hours of Akin's win, McCaskill had cast him as a conservative extremist who would jeopardize seniors' health care and retirement savings while putting college out of reach for all but the rich.
Akin countered by portraying McCaskill — one of the most vulnerable Democratic incumbents in the nation — as a budget-busting, tax-hiking, big-spending liberal.
Engaged Voter posted at 5:52 pm on Mon, Aug 20, 2012.
*yawn*
Typical misogynistic, Bronze Age primitive thinking from the Religious Right.
Nothing new here.
Haddie Nuff posted at 4:16 pm on Mon, Aug 20, 2012.
And this guy is a member of the House Science Committee? He claims he 'misspoke' and meant to say forcible instead of legitimate, kind of a strange mixup, but saying a woman's body shut down the ability to get pregnant whether the rape is 'legitmate' or 'forced' is an even stranger concept.
Is the best we can do for representation? I know 14 year olds that are smarter than Akin. And keep in mind the Science Committee looks at research projects not connected with the military.
Mike McClellan posted at 8:51 am on Mon, Aug 20, 2012.
All of a sudden, social issues might be a big part of the fall campaign.
Here's why:
Akin's stupidity in his comments obscures the argument he's making -- that a pregnancy conceived in rape should not be aborted.
A position VP candidate Paul Ryan has embraced, despite the Romney/Ryan position today.
Less than a year ago, Ryan was one of the sponsors of the Sanctity of LIfe Act, which would give a fetus -- at the moment of fertilization -- the full rights of a sentinent adult.
Which means, of course, a fetus conceived in rape has the same rights as you and I do.
I'd like some reporter to ask Mr. Ryan to explain the discrepancy between his bill from a year ago and the statement from his campaign today -- which is the truth?
Or was he for the fetus before he was against it?
Dale Whiting posted at 8:28 am on Mon, Aug 20, 2012.
"Mispoke?" The h e double toothpicks, he mispoke. Are all Neo-cons this dumb? No. But clearly he is. Biden mispeaks. He says what he means and means what he says, occasionally choosing phrases that could have been selected more carefully. But here we have the essence of Neo-conservatism. In a collision of values, the choice is the one most likely to conform to the overly simplistic planks in the platform, the one build upon principles not founded upon true conservatism. And this guy invented science to support his statement. Nothng 'Mispoken" here.
Juggernaut8000 posted at 8:17 am on Mon, Aug 20, 2012.
This fool needs to be voted out of office. What a complete, senseless moron.
azjean55 posted at 10:12 pm on Sun, Aug 19, 2012.
I am speechless. Oh my God. What an idiot.
downtownresident posted at 8:45 pm on Sun, Aug 19, 2012.
What an IDIOT!!!!!!!!! Legitimate rape??????????
This guy is really ignorant. How could anybody vote for him???????