East Valley Tribune

May 20, 2013 | 07:37 pm
East Valley Tribune Facebook East Valley Tribune Twitter East Valley Tribune Mobile Version East Valley Tribune Facebook

Arizona House approves measure to allow teaching of Bible in public high schools

Print
Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Tuesday, February 21, 2012 2:50 pm | Updated: 9:54 am, Wed Feb 29, 2012.

The state House voted 42-15 Tuesday to allow high schools to teach elective courses on the influence of the Bible on Western culture and civilization.

Tuesday's vote came over the objections of House Minority Leader Chad Campbell. The Phoenix Democrat said limiting schools to using the Old and New Testaments "is going to run into a constitutional challenge."

But Rep. Terri Proud, R-Tucson, who crafted HB 2563, said she does not see a problem. She said the language allowing the use of the texts for non-religious purposes has been approved by others.

Proud did agree to several last-minute changes, including one that requires the courses to accommodate not only diverse religious views but also non-religious views. The bill now goes to the Senate.

Nothing in the legislation requires schools to offer the courses. And Rep. Doris Goodale, R-Kingman, said they are not designed to teach religion.

"This bill is a cultural exploration of how the Bible, as a teaching instrument, will aid in understanding the development of our country," she said. "It is simply a historical, cultural document to be used if a school district adopts this course of study."

Campbell said that may all be true. And he said schools can teach the effect of religion and texts on culture.

But he said lawmakers cannot pick and choose which ones they want to teach.

Campbell attempted to ask Proud during the floor debate why she chose only these religious documents and not others. But she refused to answer his questions.

Rep. Ruben Gallego, D-Phoenix, pointed out he represents a district that includes the Yaqui and Gila River communities.

"I would hope that we would also have respect for their religions," he said.

Before approving the bill, lawmakers specifically rejected a proposal by Rep. Ed Ableser, D-Tempe, to add the Book of Mormon and two other texts of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints to the materials permitted.

"I have a young girl and at some point she will be enrolling in schools across Arizona," Ableser said. "And I hope someday she'll be able to take classes, not only on the Bible and the importance of the Bible in Western culture, but also about three other texts I greatly respect and honor."

Aside from the Book of Mormon, that includes the Doctrine and Covenants as well as the Pearl of Great Price.

Ableser said the LDS Church and founder Joseph Smith both had an effect in American culture and history.

"Many children have a right to learn about that as well, and receive (academic) credit," he said.

But Rep. Eddie Farnsworth, R-Gilbert, said it would be wrong to say that LDS members like himself, who refused to support Ableser's efforts to add Mormon texts but voted to allow Old and New Testament studies, were more interested in supporting a Republican bill than in their religion.

"I will break with my caucus to vote for or against things that I agree or disagree with," Farnsworth said. "This is no different," he added, saying he supports legislation if he believes it contains good policies.

The legislation specifically allows courses that teach students:

- The contents of the Old and New Testaments.

- History recorded by both books.

- Literary style and structure of the books.

- Influence of the books on laws, history, government, literature, art, music, customs, morals, values and culture.

 

 

More about

More about

More about

  • Discuss

Welcome to the discussion.

11 comments:

  • hamguy posted at 3:17 pm on Tue, Feb 21, 2012.

    hamguy Posts: 35

    hat constitutional challenge. The Constitution only says that the government will not establish a religion.
    Since the US was founded on basiocally Christian fundumentals, the Old and New testament makes more sense than trying to use all of the other religous texts and is not espousing one religion over another.
    I think many people have not studied the Constitution much less the Bible but prefer to listen to the talking heads.

     
  • VerdeValleyVeteran posted at 3:25 pm on Tue, Feb 21, 2012.

    VerdeValleyVeteran Posts: 3

    Where can we read the text of the measure/bill?

     
  • VerdeValleyVeteran posted at 3:28 pm on Tue, Feb 21, 2012.

    VerdeValleyVeteran Posts: 3

    I found it.

     
  • VerdeValleyVeteran posted at 3:34 pm on Tue, Feb 21, 2012.

    VerdeValleyVeteran Posts: 3

    http://e-lobbyist.com/gaits/text/521255

     
  • AZMomma posted at 4:45 pm on Tue, Feb 21, 2012.

    AZMomma Posts: 358

    Yep - let's do YOUR version of the Bible, complete with the "notes/interpretations" approved by (whatever) dogma you espouse. Will the "lost" Books be included? You know, the ones tossed aside by the Nicean Creed crowd.
    You guys are bound and determined to force your views on others - and it is NOT appreciated.
    [sad]

     
  • samkat posted at 6:45 pm on Tue, Feb 21, 2012.

    samkat Posts: 1163

    Does this mean that they are going to allow teaching the Quran as well? I am being a little flippant but if they are going to push one then they need to be prepared to allow the others as well since we now have a fairly sizable Muslim population in the state. I am not sure what the other religions use but this bill is going to see an ACLU lawsuit big time.

     
  • samkat posted at 6:53 pm on Tue, Feb 21, 2012.

    samkat Posts: 1163

    Thanks for the web link verde. It appears that they are making it a mandatory course. If I had children in school, I would take them to court big time as they are now forcing their religious beliefs upon my children.

     
  • DrJCA1 posted at 11:09 pm on Tue, Feb 21, 2012.

    DrJCA1 Posts: 315

    On more than one occasion, I have read the statement that the US was founded on "christian principles". I'm curious as to exactly what those principles are. If you spout out the ten commnadments, that's a jewish thing. If you spout out not to rob, steal, cheat, lie, murder, etc, those are universal things - some before christianity (eg: buddhism, Judiasm, Zoroastrianism). So, anyone care to enlighten me about these so-called "chrisitan" principles? The only actual christian principle not taken from other faiths is the belief that Jesus was the messiah.

     
  • soricobob posted at 4:40 am on Wed, Feb 22, 2012.

    soricobob Posts: 665

    Let's see; 1. Evaluate teachers by student's progress; 2. Allow guns on college campuses; 3. Introduce courses regarding the Bible. These legislators have really focused in on what's wrong with education today!

     
  • soricobob posted at 4:41 am on Wed, Feb 22, 2012.

    soricobob Posts: 665

    Oh, I forgot; 4. Stop the teachers from cussing. Now, that about sums up whats wrong!

     
  • DrJCA1 posted at 4:06 pm on Wed, Feb 22, 2012.

    DrJCA1 Posts: 315

    Between the sports nuts and the religious nuts, our educational system is now firmly in the toilet. What happened to all of us academic nuts of years gone by? My neighborhood in Brooklyn was about 95% Jewish. We did not teach one thing about our religion in the public schools, and had trophies for academic excellence in the hallways. Over 98% of us graduated high school, over 90% went on to college, and almost all of us graduated from the halls of higher education. How far down we have come in the past half century. Very sad indeed.

     

Rules of Conduct

Welcome!
|
Not you?||
LogoutMy Dashboard

Connect with us