East Valley Tribune

June 19, 2013 | 12:28 am
East Valley Tribune Facebook East Valley Tribune Twitter East Valley Tribune Mobile Version East Valley Tribune Facebook
Best of East Valley 2013

Not having cheddar for breakfast

Print
Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Mark J. Scarp is a contributing columnist for the Tribune. Reach him at mscarp1@cox.net.

Posted: Sunday, November 13, 2011 7:00 am

If you’re an out-of-state Republican politician seeking kindred spirits, last week probably was not the best time to show up in Arizona.

Russell Pearce was tossed out of his Mesa legislative district. And a Democrat was elected as mayor of Phoenix — the second in a row.

So, maybe Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker actually was here doing as our governor is doing, touring other states to promote his new book?

“No,” Walker said Thursday evening when I asked him that, then laughed at my corny follow-up, “Really? No ‘Cheddar for Breakfast’?”

Really. Walker said his wife has family in the Valley, and what better place to escape for a long holiday weekend from America’s chilly Dairyland than here?

And climate aside, for all this week’s disappointments, Arizona still is a great temporary respite if you’re the governor of Wisconsin. Walker, of course, weathered a massive political crisis earlier this year when thousands of union-supporting protesters invaded and encamped in his state’s Capitol in Madison, upset over a bill to eliminate collective bargaining for most state public employees.

The bill became law, and several Wisconsin legislators found themselves in recall elections that had mixed results. With the overturning by Ohio voters Tuesday of a bill that state’s lawmakers passed to similarly limit collective bargaining, recall efforts have begun against Walker in Wisconsin.

This was long after he accepted an invitation to come to Phoenix to speak at the Goldwater Institute’s annual dinner, held Thursday at the Phoenician Resort in Scottsdale.

But during a pre-speech interview with a local television station (delays in Walker’s arrival left no time for my scheduled interview, so I could only listen and take notes as he spoke to the TV reporter), Walker said he believes that Dairy State voters will come to appreciate him as time goes on.

“The more people see the results in our state, the reforms that are in place… creating more jobs,” he said, “the more they see, the more they’ll like.” That will include plans to freeze his state’s property tax rates next month, he said.

Gov. Jan Brewer wasn’t at Thursday’s event. But she might want to make a few notes on some ideas from Walker about handling union protests.

Arizona’s unions don’t have collective bargaining ability regarding state employees.

Arizona had a similar process called “meet and confer” that was instituted by former Gov. Janet Napolitano, but Gov. Jan Brewer repealed it in April, Capitol Media Services reported at the time.

My former Tribune colleague Mark Flatten, now an investigative reporter for the Phoenix-based Goldwater Institute, pointed out Thursday that the issue for Arizona early next year will be changing personnel rules that proponents will argue make state government more accountable.

Flatten wrote a piece in May that quoted the head of a prominent public-employee union. She vowed Wisconsin-like protests at the Capitol if Brewer goes ahead with calling a special session in 2012 asking for changes to the personnel rules.

Flatten had written a report earlier this year titled “Undisciplined Bureaucracy,” which concluded that the process to discipline or remove state employees for infractions such as being asleep on duty and sexual harassment, among others, was unwieldy and expensive compared to the private sector.

In his report, Flatten cited other states’ personnel-rules changes — particularly in Georgia, where the time an employee whose conduct is questioned could be on paid administrative leave was sharply reduced, hastening resolution of investigation into his/her conduct — as working.

In the interview, Walker said the changes he supported in Wisconsin enabled state workers to be eligible for merit pay and bonuses to be granted for productive work, including a pay-for-performance plan, “just like the private sector.”

He said these measures protected middle-class jobs.

“Every week that goes by, the reforms are working,” he said.

You don’t have to look hard to see how many public-sector employees have benefits that are greater than many of those in the private sector. Public employees say that’s why they go to work for government — not for the higher pay they can get in the private sector, but for the benefits that in many situations are more plentiful.

Walker said those workers need to ask their neighbors in the private sector what kind of health-care and pension benefits they have, implying that the government workers still have it better in Wisconsin even with this year’s new law.

Maybe those benefits need to be cut back to help balance state budgets. Who knows? Each side has its own numbers. But while cost-cutters like Walker gain short-term budget advantage, what’s the long-term economic result of fewer dollars in the pockets of state government employees, one of the largest groups of workers in a state?

As for Brewer, perhaps she might want to take to heart Walker’s observation that if he had this year to do over again, he’d lay out better political groundwork beforehand.

Good idea.

For as Russell Pearce could tell him: You just never know when you’re going to be recalled.

• Read Tribune contributing columnist Mark J. Scarp’s (mscarp1@cox.net) opinions here on Sundays. View his video commentaries at evtnow.com/scarp

More about

More about

  • Discuss

Welcome to the discussion.

3 comments:

  • wdgnas posted at 7:31 am on Mon, Nov 14, 2011.

    wdgnas Posts: 549

    chatmandu002: just curious. how much money was spent in ohio trying not to overturn the union restrictions?

     
  • Leon Ceniceros posted at 4:30 pm on Sun, Nov 13, 2011.

    Leon Ceniceros Posts: 2612

    "Maybe those benefits need to be cut back to help balance the state budget. Who knows? = Hello, Mark....this is your...."Mike Mcqueary Moment"....are you going to run to your buddy, Mark Flatten or his "Horizon" TV show buddy, Ted Simmon for advice and counciling......or are you going to stand up on your "own hind legs" for once and give "your" opinion.

    What has happened to acting like an adult "man" or "woman" in America.

    We have a President, Barack Hussein Obama (who may or may not have been born in Hawaii..lol) = who is per his own White House staff's admission believes in ..."Leading from Behind".
    Most of our Leaders have no stomach for "leading" anymore....just look at Attorney General Holder and Secretary of Homeland "IN-Security", Janet Napolitano.
    Our City Council Members have become "nodding head dolls" doing the Mayors bidding in most Arizona Cities and Towns.

    Thank God for Leaders like Sheriff Joe Arpaio, Sheriff Paul Babeu, ex-Speaker Adams, ex-Senate President Russell Pearce and our strong, gutsy Governor Janet Brewer.

    So Mark, write a column with an opinion.."your" opinion..not your editors, not your publishers, not what readers want to hear but what you believe deep down in your guts..don't be like the "reader-commenters" in this newspaper who don't have the guts to put their names to what they standfor.
    Emiliano Zapata, a Mexican Revolutionary Leader said it perfectly = "I would rather live one day standing up the a lifetime on my knees".

     
  • chatmandu002 posted at 11:07 am on Sun, Nov 13, 2011.

    chatmandu002 Posts: 1046

    Mark,
    I thought getting the public sector unions under control and restricting their bargaining rights would be a long term advantage for the state of Wisconsin. Or is it that you believe the unions will get back all these rights if Gov Walker is recalled. With the labor union spending over $30+million in Ohio to overturn the union restrictions, I wonder how much the unions will spend to recall Gov Walker and get democrats elected. All this money being spent by unions to overturn and recall people, while the 99%ers are complaining about the corporations buying politicians and influencing legislation.

     
Welcome!
|
Not you?||
LogoutMy Dashboard

Happening Now...

 
Submit a calendar event