ACC candidates argue over nuclear power - East Valley Tribune: East Valley Local News

ACC candidates argue over nuclear power

Print
Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Monday, September 15, 2008 6:06 pm | Updated: 10:55 pm, Fri Oct 7, 2011.

The outcome of the Arizona Corporation Commission race in November could determine whether there will be more nuclear power plants in the state - and possibly even new coal-fueled generators.

At a debate Monday, all three Republicans said that nuclear needs to remain one of the options for the state to meet its future demands.

Public financing, pooling money key to ACC race

ACC race could decide fate of energy mandate

"In order for the state to grow and sustain itself, we must have reliable electricity," said Barry Wong. "We need to support a balanced portfolio ... whether it's from coal generation, nuclear, natural gas or renewables."

And Marian McClure said coal in particular cannot be ignored.

"It is still the least expensive," she said. McClure also said that with "scrubbers" to remove smokestack pollutants "there is very little emissions that are harming your environment."

But Paul Newman, one of the Democrats running for the three open seats on the panel, said the regulators need to be cautious when proceeding down that path.

"We need diversification," he said. "But there are some problems, big problems, with nuclear expansion."

Newman said the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, which would have to approve new plants, has called the design for the next generation of nuclear plants "problematical at best."

"That means a long delay for nuclear development," he said.

The other Democrats, running as the self-described "solar team," also questioned expanding those two sources of power in Arizona.

Sandra Kennedy said solar and wind should be the primary sources of new power, with new natural gas power plants "a distant third."

Kennedy acknowledged that power from "renewable" sources currently is more expensive. But she predicted that the cost advantage of both nuclear and fossil fuels would disappear by 2015.

And Sam George even wants to accelerate the current mandate on utilities to generate at least 15 percent of their power from "renewable" sources by 2025.

That mandate does come with a price tag: The commission is allowing Tucson Electric Power Co. to charge residential customers an extra $2 a month, with higher costs for businesses. The cap is $1.32 for Arizona Public Service and $1.05 for other utilities.

Technically, the commission does not dictate what kind of power plants utilities build.

But the commission does have the power to mandate how much power needs to come from certain sources. And the panel did give its blessing to the construction of the Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station more than two decades ago by allowing Arizona Public Service to raise its rates to cover construction costs even before the plant was operating.

Some of the debate took on partisan tones as the Democrats were critical of the current five-member commission, composed entirely of Republicans.

On one hand, it was the Republican-controlled commission that gave the renewable energy mandate final approval in 2006. But George complained that it took five years from when the idea was first discussed to make it happen.

There also were marked differences in the level of regulation each side believes is appropriate.

"Our future could be one of higher taxes on energy and more regulation of renewable energy industries, including solar, which will slow our economic growth, hamper innovation and make our country less clean," said Bob Stump.

He said a better alternative is when "innovation arises from a healthy economy based on economic liberty."

Wong said government intervention is appropriate only when private companies and a free market do not work. "However we must tread carefully on regulation as well so as to not overregulate ... which could also stifle and minimize market growth and market entrepreneurship."

George, however, said the state cannot rely on the private sector to deal with issues like climate change, which is why he wants to mandate alternate energy sources. He called that "a real crisis which is greater than any war."

And Kennedy said the commission needs to protect ratepayers.

"Who's going to look after the consumer when the Corporation Commission basically is an agency that really looks after the big guy," she said. "We just really need to return the power to the people."

All the candidates had some questions about allowing utilities to pass along at least some of their advertising costs to ratepayers.

George said utilities have used consumer dollars to conduct "image campaigns" on renewable energy. But he said the reality is that less than 1 percent of all power used in this state comes from alternate sources.

"When it comes to advertising, I'm still at a loss to understand why a monopoly needs to advertise in the first place," Stump said. "We don't have a choice of choosing between utilities."

  • Discuss

EVT Ice Bucket Challenge

The East Valley Tribune accepts the Ice Bucket Challenge.

Facebook

EastValleyTribune.com on Facebook

Twitter

EastValleyTribune.com on Twitter

Google+

EastValleyTribune.com on Google+

RSS

Subscribe to EastValleyTribune.com via RSS

RSS Feeds

Spacer4px
Your Az Jobs